Ironmaster fixed their Super Bench!

By |2019-11-13T13:50:58-07:00December 23rd, 2018|Categories: Equipment Guides|Tags: , , |0 Comments

Good news — Ironmaster fixed their Super Bench!!

They just unveiled their Super Bench Pro on Friday. It’s a big deal because they fixed two major bugs in the old design: The somewhat squishy pad, and the 20″ bench height in flat position that is too high for the average lifter. 

The old Ironmaster Super Bench – Why it’s insanely popular

Let me fill you in on some context.

Ironmaster is best known for their Quick Lock Adjustable Dumbbell System that rival the Powerblock and Bowflex adjustable dumbbells because of their extreme durability with the nearly all-metal metal construction instead of plastic.

Ironmaster also happens to make a really good bench to use with their adjustable dumbbells, or in a power rack or as a general use gym bench for that matter. Bowflex or PowerBlock simply do not make a bench of this quality.

The Ironmaster Super Bench (original) has been loved for years because of its unique design that solved a major problem in other benches, the dreaded “pad gap”. Its detachable seat pad design completely eliminates the pad gap.

Let me show you what I mean, on another brand of bench:

Adjustable bench pad gap in flat position
NOT the Ironmaster Super Bench, but another bench of bench to illustrate the typical huge pad gap in flat position

The pad gap in most benches like the above bench is required so as to give room for the back and seat pads to move in as you adjust to incline position.

Here’s how Ironmaster solved it:

A closer look – As you can see, the seat of the Ironmaster Super Bench does not go INTO the back pad, but hooks around it.

This eliminates the pad gap entirely, removing the discomfort associated with having that 2″ gap in your lower back area when doing flat presses.

That, along with the fact that the adjustment mechanism is so sweet, and it has a ton of attachments if you’re interested, is why it’s such a popular bench. I featured it in the Top 4 Adjustable FID Benches article as perhaps the best FID weight bench, which I need to update with the Pro at this point!

The new Super Bench Pro – Quick rundown

Ironmaster Super Bench Pro 2018
Ironmaster Super Bench Pro – Yeah, it looks pretty similar to the old one!

Here’s what they improved.

  1. Height in flat position is 17.2″, down from 20“.
    Huge improvement. This puts it at the optimal height for most people to plant their feet safely and comfortably.
  2. Firm pad.
    Along with the height, this was a major complaint of the old model. Now it totally feels like a commercial quality bench.
  3. Wheels are included.
    No need to buy their $30 wheel kit.
  4. Larger frame.
    The base frame is 4″ wider and 4″ longer, with larger tubing, making the bench more stable under heavy load. I didn’t know that was even an issue in the old model, but ok.
  5. More secure connection for attachments.
    They now have a pin and a separate tightening knob. This is like what I’ve seen in the sliding adjustment for glute-ham developers to make things feel nice and solid.

They bumped up the price by $50 to $369. Considering that other benches comparable to it (but without the awesome gapless design) are $400, that’ not a bad jump in price for what you get.

The wheel location was an odd choice. They put them the wheels at the front of bench, unlike virtually all other brands of benches. You want the wheels to be on the rear so that you can wheel the bench in and out of your power rack easily. Not to mention that would put them out of the way of your feet when lying on the bench. Ironmaster primarily markets this bench to use with their popular Quicklock dumbbells, so I can kind of understand it, but still, weird choice. Ironmaster confirmed with me that you can put the wheels on the rear too. 

Do the attachments still work?

Most of the attachments for the Super Bench work for the Super Bench Pro, such as the crunch/situp attachment… and Ironmaster has an unusually large number of other accessories for this bench.

One exception is the leg developer (leg curl / leg extension) attachment. It does not fit on the Super Bench Pro because the new bench isn’t tall enough.

To further explain, this is a natural consequence of a better (lower) height. A leg developer requires a bench to be inordinately tall for it to work, or have some rollers to raise your knees higher, or you’d hit your feet on the floor at the bottom end of your range of motion. I’m glad they’re dropping that option. The stupid leg developers are an attachment mainly marketed towards newbies to be able to do presses and leg work all in one unit. For leg work most people should be concentrating on squats, deadlifts, lunges and other compound movements.

Is the Super Bench Pro worth the upgrade?

Normally the incremental improvements in gym equipment don’t justify you buying a replacement. What you have is ordinarily fine.

In this case, Ironmaster is the only company making a bench with this kind of “no pad gap” design in the first place, because it’s patented, or at least the ring adjustment mechanism allowing for it is.

I have no doubt that current owners of the bench are going to be selling it on the used market and springing for this upgraded design. It’s that big of a deal. So yeah, if you’ve got the cash, you will enjoy this bench significantly more.

As always, you can get it direct from Ironmaster and that’s about it, because they have no online dealers.

About the Author:

David Kiesling
David founded Adamant Barbell in 2007 and Two Rep Cave in 2018. Lately he spends his free time practicing archery and hang gliding.

Share Your Thoughts

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of

Latest Discussions on Two Rep Cave

Historically, the knurling has been inconsistent by my observation. For example, my dad bought an Eleiko Competition Bar 30 years ago. He and his training partner used it a few…

The knurling on the NxG bars are more aggressive, but also more precise/refined than the previous bars. The IWF Comp is the most aggressive for an Olympic bar at 1.2mm…

As someone who owns three Eleiko Competition Bars, I can tell you unequivocally, that the finish is superior, at least visually, on my older bars. The oldest is from 1991…

I'll keep refining the design and post an update.